Commander in Chief
Commander in Chief - Casey Byrne Knudsen Dominguez Nedostupné

Kniha ( pevná vazba )

    • Produkt je nedostupný.
E-shopové listy

Při zaslání zboží balíčkem

K nákupu nad 99 Kč dárek zdarma v hodnotě 19 Kč

E-shopové listy

Jíst, či nejíst - To je, oč tu běží

Při zaslání zboží balíčkem

K nákupu nad 1999 Kč dárek zdarma v hodnotě 299 Kč

Jíst, či nejíst - To je, oč tu běží

The constitutional balance of war powers has shifted from Congress to the president over time. Today, presidents broadly define their constitutional authority as commander in chief. In the nineteenth century, however, Congress was the institution that claimed and defended expansive war powers authority. This discrepancy raises important… Přejít na celý popis

K tomuto produktu zákazníci kupují

Popis

The constitutional balance of war powers has shifted from Congress to the president over time. Today, presidents broadly define their constitutional authority as commander in chief. In the nineteenth century, however, Congress was the institution that claimed and defended expansive war powers authority. This discrepancy raises important questions: How, specifically, did Congress define the boundaries between presidential and congressional war powers in the early republic? Did that definition change, and if so, when, how, and why did it do so?Based on an original, comprehensive dataset of every congressional reference to the commander-in-chief clause from the Founding through 1917, Casey Dominguez’s Commander in Chief systematically analyzes the authority that members of Congress ascribe to the president as commander in chief and the boundaries they put around that authority.

Dominguez shows that for more than a century members of Congress defined the commander in chief’s authority narrowly, similar to that of any high-ranking military officer. But in a wave of nationalism during the Spanish-American War, members of Congress began to argue that Congress owed deference to the commander in chief. They also tended to argue that a president of their own party should have broad war powers, while the powers of a president in the other party should be defined narrowly. Together, these two dynamics suggest that the conditions for presidentially dominated modern constitutional war powers were set at the turn of the twentieth century, far earlier than is often acknowledged.

Sdílet

Nakladatel
University Press of Kansas
Rozměr
161 x 237 x 26
jazyk
angličtina
Vazba
pevná vazba
Hmotnost
560 g
isbn
978-0-7006-3651-8
Počet stran
280
datum vydání
24.05.2024
ean
9780700636518

Hodnocení a recenze čtenářů Nápověda

0.0 z 5 0 hodnocení čtenářů

0× 5 hvězdiček 0× 4 hvězdičky 0× 3 hvězdičky 0× 2 hvězdičky 0× 1 hvezdička

Přidejte své hodnocení knihy

Vývoj ceny

Vývoj ceny Nápověda

Získejte přehled o vývoji ceny za posledních 60 dní.

Maloobchodní cena Minimální prodejní cena: 0 Kč Nápověda

Články, které stojí za pozornost

Zobrazit blog

Články, které stojí za pozornost